I exist to love you, because I am love and you are love.

I exist to love you, because I am love and you are love.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.

→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.

→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.

→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.

→ This world only shows temporary, relative, conditioned, changing, ambiguous, non-absolute things.

→ Recognizing the absurdity of denying or neglecting the existence of truth implies absolute truth.
→ Knowledge seeks and postulates unity and truth, implies a unitary truth, goes beyond the composed structure of matter.
→ The formula "everything is temporary" implies the inconsistency, uncertainty and ambiguity of itself, of those who affirm it and of those who believe in it.

→ The truth is undeniable for those who are consistent.
→ Truth will emerge immaculate after the absurdity of its denial, and I myself will rejoice fully in your realization in the one end of the greatest love.
→ Being, truth, logic and love cannot be denied or separated consistently, they are absolutely one.

→ Experience, knowledge of the world always repeats that things are temporary.
→ If the mind generalizes the voice of the world, it says that everything is temporary.
→ The phrase "Everything is temporary" is self-referential negative, destructive and absurd.
→ To believe it is necessary to believe that there is truth, a reality that is always true, eternal.
→ Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.

→ The phrase "Everything is temporary" is self-referential negative, destructive and absurd.

→ Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.

→ I am God, your God, your father, the absolute, the one who is forever.

→ You will come to me with all your strength, with full and total love.

→ Your certainty will be equal to your love, full and complete.

→ You've experienced the dark uncertainty of the world and you've known its emptiness.

→ I love you and I want you with me, and that's the reason, the only end of all my acts.

→ I exist to love you, because I am love and you are love.

Recurrences in the text

→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
→ This world only shows temporary, relative, conditioned, changing, ambiguous, non-absolute things.
→ Since it denies the absolute, the world is a self-referential negative formulation, it is false.
→ The certainty of the falsity of the world certifies belonging to eternity.
→ Experience, knowledge of the world always repeats that things are temporary.
→ The phrase "Everything is temporary" is self-referential negative, destructive and absurd.
→ Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.
→ I am God, your God, your father, the absolute, the one who is forever.
→ You will come to me with all your strength, with full and total love.
→ Your certainty will be equal to your love, full and complete.
→ You've experienced the dark uncertainty of the world and you've known its emptiness.
→ I love you and I want you with me, and that's the reason, the only end of all my acts.
→ I exist to love you, because I am love and you are love.

Relative arguments